Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUnsal, Ayla
dc.contributor.authorGozum, Sebahat
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-24T20:59:40Z
dc.date.available2019-11-24T20:59:40Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067
dc.identifier.issn1365-2702
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03111.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/3308
dc.descriptionWOS: 000275531500025en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 20492058en_US
dc.description.abstractAims and objectives. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with arthritis, the types of complementary and alternative medicine used, pertinent socio-demographic factors associated with complementary and alternative medicine use and its perceived efficacy. Background. Arthritis is a major health issue, and the use of complementary and alternative medicine among patients with arthritis is common. Design. This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. Methods. Data were obtained from 250 patients with arthritis at the physiotherapy and immunology clinics Ataturk University Hospital in eastern Turkey between May-July 2005 using a questionnaire developed specifically for this study. The instrument included questions on socio-demographic information, disease specifics and complementary and alternative medicine usage. Results. Seventy-six per cent of participants reported use of at least one form of complementary and alternative medicine in the previous year. Complementary and alternative medicine users and non-users were not significantly different in most socio-demographic characteristics including age, gender, marital status and education level with the exception of economic status. We categorised treatment into six complementary and alternative medicine categories: 62 center dot 6% of patients used thermal therapies; 41 center dot 5% used oral herbal therapies; 40 center dot 5% used hot therapies; 32 center dot 6% used externally applied (skin) therapies; 28 center dot 4% used massage and 12 center dot 6% used cold therapies. All forms of complementary and alternative medicine except thermal and oral herbal therapies were perceived as very effective by more than half of study participants. Conclusions. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy is widely used by patients with arthritis and has perceived beneficial effects. Relevance to clinical practice. It is important for nurses and other health care professionals to be knowledgeable about the use of complementary and alternative medicine therapies when providing care to patients with arthritis because of possible interactions with other treatments, delays in seeking care and the potential for poor quality products. It is also essential for health professionals to discuss treatment options with patients and to monitor treatment efficacy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03111.xen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectarthritisen_US
dc.subjectcomplementary and alternative medicineen_US
dc.subjectefficacyen_US
dc.subjectnursingen_US
dc.subjectpatientsen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleUse of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with arthritisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSINGen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue7.Ağuen_US
dc.identifier.startpage1129en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1138en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster