Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUzun, Erdal
dc.contributor.authorMisir, Abdulhamit
dc.contributor.authorKizkapan, Turan Bilge
dc.contributor.authorOzcamdalli, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAkkurt, Soner
dc.contributor.authorGuney, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-24T21:01:12Z
dc.date.available2019-11-24T21:01:12Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2325-9671
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119843203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/3499
dc.descriptionWOS: 000467609100001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 31157282en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lateral meniscal tears in the stable knee are rare. There are few comparative studies evaluating functional and radiological outcomes of vertical longitudinal and bucket-handle lateral meniscal tears. Purpose: To evaluate the midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopically repaired traumatic vertical longitudinal and bucket-handle lateral meniscal tears. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 43 full-thickness lateral meniscal repairs, including 22 (51.2%) for vertical longitudinal tears and 21 (48.8%) for bucket-handle tears, were evaluated. A clinical assessment was performed according to the Barrett criteria, and patient outcomes were measured with the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, and overall satisfaction scale. Magnetic resonance imaging was used as the radiological re-examination method preoperatively and at final follow-up. A subgroup analysis examining isolated repair versus repair with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was performed. Results: The mean follow-up period was 63.2 months (range, 24-86 months). Based on clinical and radiological outcomes, 38 of the 43 repairs (88.3%) were successful, and the remaining 5 (11.6%) cases were considered to be failures. Overall, the combined results for both groups demonstrated an improvement in the Lysholm score, Tegner score, and patient satisfaction. There was no significant difference in the postoperative Lysholm score (91.4 vs 87.0, respectively; P = .223), Tegner score (5.4 vs 5.5, respectively; P = .872), or patient satisfaction (7.2 vs 7.4, respectively; P = .624) between bucket-handle repair and vertical longitudinal repair. The subgroup analysis demonstrated no difference in outcome scores for isolated repair versus repair with concurrent ACL reconstruction. Smoking was identified as a risk factor for repair failure. Conclusion: Comparable clinical and radiological outcomes were obtained after vertical longitudinal and bucket-handle lateral meniscal repairs using the all-inside or hybrid suture technique with different suture configurations, regardless of whether ACL reconstruction was performed. Smoking was identified as a risk factor for failure.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/2325967119843203en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectlateral meniscusen_US
dc.subjectmeniscal repairen_US
dc.subjectvertical longitudinalen_US
dc.subjectbucket-handleen_US
dc.subjectACLen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Arthroscopically Repaired Vertical Longitudinal and Bucket-Handle Lateral Meniscal Tearsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji ABDen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster