Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCirakli, Alper
dc.contributor.authorSezgin, Hicabi
dc.contributor.authorGocer, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorDabak, Nevzat
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-24T21:01:19Z
dc.date.available2019-11-24T21:01:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1309-0720
dc.identifier.issn1309-2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.4441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/3512
dc.descriptionWOS: 000376567100026en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the cases who underwent tumor resection prosthesis due to osteosarcoma. Material and Method: 14 cases who underwent tumor resection prosthesis due to osteosarcoma in our clinic between 2000 and 2012 and who had sufficient follow-ups were evaluated. The cases were examined in terms of gender, age, direction, tumor location, follow-up time, success of the treatment, complication, recurrence, and survival. The data obtained were transferred to the SPSS 15.0 program and analyzed. Normality distributions of the data were analyzed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Results: 8 of the 14 cases were male, 6 were female, and the average age of the cases was 21.9 +/- 7.02. Osteosarcoma was in the distal femur in 9 (64.3%) of the patients, in the proximal tibia in 5 (35.7%) of the patients, in the right lower extremity in 5 of the patients, and in the left lower extremity in 9 of the patients. Average follow-up time was 33 months (3-144 months range). Average MSTS score was found as 81.9 (53-96 range), perfect results were taken in 11 (78.6%) patients while insufficient results were taken in 3 (21.4%) patients. As for complications, aseptic softening was observed in 3 cases, peroneal nerve paralysis was observed in 2 cases, skin necrosis was observed in 2 cases, periprostatic fracture was observed in 2 cases, prosthesis infection was observed in 1 case, and local recurrence was observed in 1 case. Except for the two cases with peroneal nerve paralysis, cases with complications recovered without any problems. The patient who developed local recurrence was lost due to lung metastasis. Discussion: Treatment of osteosarcoma through tumor resection prosthesis raises question marks due to possible complications that can affect the survival of the prosthesis in the long term. However, this treatment method is favorable in terms of stability, early load efficiency, and causing less anxiety than osteosynthesis; it is also psychologically more pleasing than amputation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDERMAN MEDICAL PUBLen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4328/JCAM.4441en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOsteosarcomaen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectTumor Resection Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectResulten_US
dc.titleModular Tumor Resection Prosthesis in Osteosarcoma Treatmenten_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji ABDen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage533en_US
dc.identifier.endpage537en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster