Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTuncay, Figen
dc.contributor.authorBorman, Pinar
dc.contributor.authorTaser, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorUnlu, Ilhan
dc.contributor.authorSamim, Erdal
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-24T21:02:38Z
dc.date.available2019-11-24T21:02:38Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0894-9115
dc.identifier.issn1537-7385
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000171
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/3650
dc.descriptionWOS: 000350203500006en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25171666en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of electrical stimulation when added to conventional physical therapy with regard to clinical and neurophysiologic changes in patients with Bell palsy. Design This was a randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients diagnosed with Bell palsy (39 right sided, 21 left sided) were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two therapy groups. Group 1 received physical therapy applying hot pack, facial expression exercises, and massage to the facial muscles, whereas group 2 received electrical stimulation treatment in addition to the physical therapy, 5 days per week for a period of 3 wks. Patients were evaluated clinically and electrophysiologically before treatment (at the fourth week of the palsy) and again 3 mos later. Outcome measures included the House-Brackmann scale and Facial Disability Index scores, as well as facial nerve latencies and amplitudes of compound muscle action potentials derived from the frontalis and orbicularis oris muscles. Results Twenty-nine men (48.3%) and 31 women (51.7%) with Bell palsy were included in the study. In group 1, 16 (57.1%) patients had no axonal degeneration and 12 (42.9%) had axonal degeneration, compared with 17 (53.1%) and 15 (46.9%) patients in group 2, respectively. The baseline House-Brackmann and Facial Disability Index scores were similar between the groups. At 3 mos after onset, the Facial Disability Index scores were improved similarly in both groups. The classification of patients according to House-Brackmann scale revealed greater improvement in group 2 than in group 1. The mean motor nerve latencies and compound muscle action potential amplitudes of both facial muscles were statistically shorter in group 2, whereas only the mean motor latency of the frontalis muscle decreased in group 1. Conclusions The addition of 3 wks of daily electrical stimulation shortly after facial palsy onset (4 wks), improved functional facial movements and electrophysiologic outcome measures at the 3-mo follow-up in patients with Bell palsy. Further research focused on determining the most effective dosage and length of intervention with electrical stimulation is warranted.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/PHM.0000000000000171en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBell Palsyen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectElectrical Stimulationen_US
dc.subjectFacial Disability Indexen_US
dc.subjectElectrophysiologicen_US
dc.titleRole of Electrical Stimulation Added to Conventional Therapy in Patients with Idiopathic Facial (Bell) Palsyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATIONen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon ABDen_US
dc.identifier.volume94en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage222en_US
dc.identifier.endpage228en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster