Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAcir, Nurullah
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T20:15:29Z
dc.date.available2019-11-26T20:15:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1018-4619
dc.identifier.issn1610-2304
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/4205
dc.descriptionWOS: 000487347700002en_US
dc.description.abstractThe ability of a soil to provide the productivity service depends on the fulfillment of the functions that enable the realization of productivity service (PS). This study was conducted to determine and map the PS capacity of surface and subsurface soils in a 195-ha farmland located at Amasya province of Turkey. Functions that contribute to the provision of PS have been identified, and effective indicators ensuring the realization of functions have been identified. Indicator values were converted to unitless scores using non-linear scoring functions defined in soil management assessment framework. Simple additive (SA) and weighted additive (WA) methods were used to calculate soil functions scores and PS index values. The weights representing the contribution ratio of each indicator to soil functions as well as each function to PS index were obtained by employing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Soil functions scores were calculated by summing of the weighted indicator scores, and the PS index value was obtained by summing the weighted function scores. Ordinary kriging, inverse distance weighting and radial basis function methods were used to produce maps for functions and PS index values. Root mean squared error and mean absolute error values were used as criteria to determine the most accurate interpolation method. The AHP technique revealed that nutrient cycle function had the highest (34%) contribution to the provision of PS, while the durability and resistance function (15%) had the lowest contribution. The PS index value was calculated as 0.57 and 0.59 by SA and WA methods, respectively. The PS index values and soil functions, except the resistance and resilience, calculated both by SA and WA were slightly different for surface and sub-surface soils. The results revealed that organic carbon is the most influential indicator affecting the soil functions and consequently the PS of soils.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPARLAR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS (P S P)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOrdinary Krigingen_US
dc.subjectProductivity serviceen_US
dc.subjectSMAFen_US
dc.subjectSoil functionsen_US
dc.subjectSoil qualityen_US
dc.titleASSESSMENT OF PRODUCTION SERVICE CAPACITY BY SOIL QUALITY EVALUATIONSen_US
dc.typereviewen_US
dc.relation.journalFRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETINen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.startpage7030en_US
dc.identifier.endpage7041en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster