Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKarartı, Caner
dc.contributor.authorBilgin, Sevil
dc.contributor.authorDadali, Yeliz
dc.contributor.authorBüyükturan, Buket
dc.contributor.authorBüyükturan, Öznur
dc.contributor.authorÖzsoy, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorBek, Nilgün
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T07:21:49Z
dc.date.available2022-11-04T07:21:49Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.citationKararti, C., Bilgin, S., Dadali, Y., Büyükturan, B., Büyükturan, Ö., Özsoy, İ., & Bek, N. (2020). Does plantar pressure distribution influence the lumbar multifidus muscle thickness in asymptomatic individuals? A preliminary study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 43(9), 909-921.en_US
dc.identifier.issn01614754
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.05.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/4700
dc.description.abstractBackground: Atrophy can occur in the lumbar multifidus (LM) muscle quickly as a result of various musculoskeletal problems. Knowing factors influencing muscle thickness of the LM will provide important clues about lumbopelvic stability. Objectives: Although there are several studies in the literature investigating the adverse effects of foot–ankle postural disorders on the lumbopelvic region, to our knowledge there has been no investigation of plantar pressure distribution (PPD) as a factor influencing muscle thickness of the LM. The aim of this study was to determine whether PPD could affect LM muscle thickness. Methods: This observational study consisted of 25 asymptomatic individuals. Ultrasonographic imaging was used to determine the thickness of the LM. All participants were subjected to PPD analysis using the Digital Biometry Scanning System and Milletrix software in 9 different plantar pressure zones. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were used to examine the correlations between the LM muscle thickness and other variables. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the variables with the greatest influence on LM muscle thickness. Results: Peak pressures of medial and lateral zones of the heel were the significant and independent factors influencing static LM thickness, with 39.5% of the variance; moreover, the peak pressures of heel medial and fourth metatarsal bone were the significant and independent factors influencing dynamic LM thickness, with 38.7% of the variance. Conclusions: Plantar pressure distribution could be an important factor influencing LM thickness, although further research is required. Examining foot–ankle biomechanics may provide information about the stability of the LM. © 2020en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.05.011en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFooten_US
dc.subjectLow Back Painen_US
dc.subjectLumbosacral Regionen_US
dc.titleDoes Plantar Pressure Distribution Influence the Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Thickness in Asymptomatic Individuals? A Preliminary Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeuticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokuluen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDCaner Karartı / 0000-0002-4655-0986en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDBuket Büyükturan / 0000-0001-5898-1698en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDÖznur Büyükturan / 0000-0002-1163-9972en_US
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage909en_US
dc.identifier.endpage921en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record