Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDağlı, Recai
dc.contributor.authorBaǧbanci, Muhammet Şahin
dc.contributor.authorDadali, Mümtaz
dc.contributor.authorErşekerci, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-07T13:40:22Z
dc.date.available2023-04-07T13:40:22Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationDagli, R., Bağbancı, M. Ş., Dadalı, M., & Erşekerci, E. (2022). Are Operating Rooms With Laminar Airflow a Risk for Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia During Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy Under Spinal Anesthesia? A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Patient Safety, 18(6), e1027-e1033.en_US
dc.identifier.issn15498417
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000966
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/5025
dc.description.abstractObjectives Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH), defined as a core temperature <36°C, is common during a surgical procedure and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Laminar (LAS) and conventional airflow systems (CAS) are used frequently for clean microenvironmental surgical areas in operating rooms. In LAS, the cold airflow is directed toward the patient, unlike CAS. Does this airflow in LAS cause heat loss from the patient by convection more than CAS? We aimed to compare the IPH frequencies of these airflow systems on patients who underwent ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (ureterorenoscopic surgery) under spinal anesthesia. Methods The study was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized trial. A total of 246 volunteers were included in the study and divided into group LAS (n = 123) and group CAS (n = 123). Randomization of patients was performed using the closed-envelope method (as 1:1). The tympanic membrane temperature of patients was measured before spinal anesthesia (T0) and then every 15 minutes (Tn) during the procedure. The IPH ratio and the change of the tympanic temperatures (ΔT) were recorded (clinical trial number: IRCT20180324039145N5). Results In total, there were no statistical differences between the IPH ratios of group LAS and group CAS (61.2% [71 of 116] versus 49.6% [57 of 115], respectively; P = 0.075). The IPH ratio was 55.4% (128 of 231). The tympanic temperatures of patients decreased about 0.64°C (0.45°C) at the 30th minute. In both groups, Δ30 was similar (0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.72 [P = 0.65]; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.74 [P = 0.236], respectively). Conclusions The risk for IPH of both LAS and CAS in the operating room is similar during ureterorenoscopic surgery. © Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/PTS.0000000000000966en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectair conditioningen_US
dc.subjectintraoperative hypothermiaen_US
dc.subjectlaminar airflowen_US
dc.subjectoperating roomsen_US
dc.subjectpatient safetyen_US
dc.subjectspinal anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectthermal regulationen_US
dc.subjectureterorenoscopic lithotripsyen_US
dc.titleAre Operating Rooms with Laminar Airflow a Risk for Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia during Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy under Spinal Anesthesia? A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trialen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Patient Safetyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorIDRecai Dağlı / 0000-0002-6364-0545en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDMümtaz Dadali / 0000-0001-9818-444Xen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDErol Erşekerci / 0000-0001-7550-3938en_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1027en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1033en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record