dc.contributor.author | Esendemir, İbrahim | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-28T12:51:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-28T12:51:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.citation | İbrahim Esendemir, Pisa'da İlk Sıralarda Yer Alan Bazı Ülkelerletürkiye'de Okul Yöneticiliği (Güney Kore, Hollanda, İrlanda ve Türkiye Karşılaştırması) (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, 2024. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/7274 | |
dc.description.abstract | Qualified human resources and a productive school life play an important role in the
healthy and sustainable conduct of educational activities. The role of school life and school
administrators in academic and social success is undeniable. There is a need for school
administrators who can solve the problems brought by the developing world in different contexts
and carry educational institutions forward. In addition, a school environment where students feel
happy and peaceful is the key to school success.
The educational management structure of any country, the training of school administrators
and the steps to establishing a healthy school life may differ. Countries learn about the educational
success of other countries through international exams that measure the global educational status.
At this point, the educational management systems of countries that have achieved high success in
these international exams, the training, selection and appointment processes of school
administrators and school life are noteworthy. PISA is an exam widely used worldwide for this
purpose. In this study, the educational management systems of the Netherlands, Ireland and South
Korea, which achieved high rankings in PISA applications, and Turkey, and the training, selection
and appointment processes of school administrators were examined using the criterion sampling
method. This study was designed with a qualitative method. In the examination of education
management systems, the training, selection and appointment processes of school administrators,
the document analysis technique was used and the results related to the countries were presented
comparatively.
It was observed that different practices were used in the selection, training and appointment
systems of education administrators in the countries examined except Turkey. It was determined
that local education authorities were generally given great say in these processes. In Turkey, unlike
these countries, it was observed that the processes were in the hands of the Ministry of National
Education, which is the central authority, and the local units authorized by the Ministry. It was
determined that the local authorized units managed the process by considering the criteria and
practices conveyed to them by the Ministry as standards. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | tur | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi - Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Educational Administration | en_US |
dc.subject | PISA | en_US |
dc.subject | Principal Selection | en_US |
dc.subject | Principal Appointment | en_US |
dc.subject | Principal Training | en_US |
dc.title | Pisa'da İlk Sıralarda Yer Alan Bazı Ülkelerletürkiye'de Okul Yöneticiliği (Güney Kore, Hollanda, İrlanda ve Türkiye Karşılaştırması) | en_US |
dc.type | masterThesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Tez | en_US |