Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTanriverdi, Cagatay
dc.contributor.authorDegirmenci, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorGonen, Engin
dc.contributor.authorBoyaci, Sedat
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T20:14:50Z
dc.date.available2019-11-26T20:14:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2285-5785
dc.identifier.issn2285-5807
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/4045
dc.descriptionWOS: 000413647600064en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study is carried on to clarify Traditional Planting and Direct Planting's effects on growth, water consumption and productivity in secondary corn product. On the trial that set up as random parcels, Pioneer 3394 corn variety is used. During the irrigation season, corn crops grown with TP and DP methods are watered 450 and 397 mm. Number of irrigation are 7 in both methods. With DP method 13.4% water saving is provided according to TP method. In Turkey on 9.87 million of deacres land where corn is produced choosing DP method instead of TP method, will save 522.9 million tons of water. Crop water consumption (ET) is calculated as 647 mm depending on soil samples. Plant height is measured as 207 cm on TP method, and 204 cm on DP method. Plant height and a year's day numbers consisting of growth period are used to obtain plant height growth model. Average leaf number is 16 in both TP and DP methods after the crop growth season. Average productivity is 1070 kg da(-1) in TP method and 1048 kg da(-1) in DP method. Depending on the study results, there are no differences in crop growth and productivity, between TP and DP methods (P>0.005). In DP method, under favour of mulch leftovers from primary product, soil surface preserves humidity better and doesn't need irrigation water for longer terms. Choosing DP method, will prolong the irrigation interval, provides less usage of water and reducing demand for cultivation, that means reduces main costs of agricultural jobs like irrigation water and labour costs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [TOVAG 106 O 565]; Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [2009/4-13M]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under project no. TOVAG 106 O 565 and Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (2009/4-13M). We'd like to thank The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) and Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit for their contributions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUNIV AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES & VETERINARY MEDICINE BUCHARESTen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjecttraditional and direct plantingen_US
dc.subjectwater consumptionen_US
dc.subjectcrop growth modelen_US
dc.titleTo Clarify The Effects Of Traditional And Direct Planting On Secondary Product Corn's Productivity And Water Consumptionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalSCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.startpage392en_US
dc.identifier.endpage400en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster