Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorHamutoğlu, Nazire Burçin
dc.contributor.authorBaşarmak, Uğur
dc.contributor.authorSezen-Gültekin, Gözde
dc.contributor.authorElmas, Muzaffer
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-14T06:40:15Z
dc.date.available2022-06-14T06:40:15Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.citationHamutoğlu, N. B., Başarmak, U., SEZEN-GÜLTEKİN, G., & Elmas, M. (2020). The Views of The Quality Ambassadors on Quality Management in Higher Education and the Technological Barriers Encountered. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 49(1), 316-351.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-9967
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.596963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/4510
dc.description.abstractIn this study, it was aimed to examine the views of quality ambassadors about general structure of quality processes in higher education and technology barriers in depth. For this purpose, the study was carried out based on the case study criteria sampling method which is one of the qualitative research method and therefore the study group consisted of eight participants who were working at a state university in Turkey and involved actively in the quality processes. A semi -structured interview form created by the researchers to collect data. Descriptive analysis was used in the analysis of data. It was found that there were some findings about the advantages of quality processes in higher education such as creation of standardization, inclusion of students in the process, elimination of arbitrariness, and ease of gaining professional skills, while there were the views on the disadvantages of quality processes in higher education, work load, formality of process, failure to meet different demands from students, the difficulty of creating new activity plans. Besides, among the views on the necessity of quality processes in higher education there were such findings as standardization, including students in the process, performance measurement, and communication with stakeholders. Finally, the external (infrastructure problems, resource constraints, vision) and the internal (individual deficiencies, beliefs) technology barriers were identified among the views on technological barriers in achieving goals and objectives in higher education during quality processes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherÇukurova Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.14812/cufej.596963en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.subjectQuality ambassadorsen_US
dc.subjectQuality processen_US
dc.subjectExternal and internal technology barriersen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.titleThe Views of The Quality Ambassadors on Quality Management in Higher Education and the Technological Barriers Encountereden_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalÇukurova University Faculty Of Education Journalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEğitim Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorIDUğur Başarmak / 0000-0002-2762-1806en_US
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage316en_US
dc.identifier.endpage351en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster