Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSagsan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorZorlu, Kursat
dc.contributor.editorTsui, E
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-24T20:58:10Z
dc.date.available2019-11-24T20:58:10Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.isbn9781906638849
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/3005
dc.description7th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning -- NOV 11-12, 2010 -- Hong Kong Polytechn Univ, Hong Kong, PEOPLES R CHINAen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000291090300046en_US
dc.description.abstractMost of the knowledge management life cycle models (KMLCM) in the literature are not only focusing on the processes of knowledge in organizations but also emphasizes the role of knowledge. The theoretical background of this study is based entirely on Sagsan's (2007) "A New Knowledge Management Life Cycle Model" (KMLCM), which are sequentially constituted at the five fundamental processes of knowledge such as creating, sharing, structuring, using and auditing with subtitles at the organizational level. Knowledge creating includes tacit and explicit dimensions of knowledge; knowledge sharing could be succeeded through establishing social and technological communications infrastructure channels; knowledge could be structured organized via knowledge mapping techniques as well as knowledge retrieval and storage systems; knowledge could be used for organizational products, services and decision making process. The last step of KMLCM is knowledge auditing, which allow us to control knowledge capacity in the organization based on the organization's intellectual capital and knowledge assets. This study aims at testing this model at the oil indistry firms, which are distributing Turkish Petroleum (TP) oils as a dealer in Turkey. It is also well-known Turkish Petroleum brands. Thus, the empirical test of the study will prove the findings in the way of applying knowledge management strategy in this firm. The results were discussed by considering each of the knowledge management processes/stages. The findings about implementing KMLCM in the firm are also differentiated at twofold. The first is about the stage of organizational life cycle (deliberate, institutionalized, innovative, rationalized, entrepreneurial) and the second is about the organizational structure such as formalization, centralization, professionalization, specialization and size. In conclusion, it could be said that both organizational life cycle stages and organizational structure variables are directly related to implement KMLCM in the firm. At the end of the study, two fundamental questions were designed for the future research.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherACAD CONFERENCES LTDen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectknowledge management life cycle modelsen_US
dc.subjectknowledge processesen_US
dc.subjectknowledge management applicationsen_US
dc.subjectorganizational structureen_US
dc.subjectorganizational life cycleen_US
dc.subjectTurkish Petroleum Oil Industry Dealer Firmen_US
dc.titleAn Empirical Test of the Knowledge Management Life Cycle Model at a Turkish Petroleum Oil Industry Firmen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.journalPROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL LEARNINGen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.startpage405en_US
dc.identifier.endpage413en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster